There are many reasons that support the ban of smoking in public places; however, there are also reasons why a smoking ban should not be imposed in public places. The cigarette is a small but deadly habit enjoyed by 45. So, if smoking is banned in public places, adults and teens are more likely to smoke and find their own means to evade this law, to continue with the habit. Over the centuries smoking tobacco has become popular and has attracted people of all ages and backgrounds thanks to advertisements. The second reason is that smoking is a cause of pollution. It sets a bad example for who may internalize this habit as something normal and may become more prone to become smokers in the future.
This is a societal issue and should be addressed collectively. If they do not want to smoke passively, they do not need to go to places where smoking is allowed. A research says that approximately 4000 chemicals. But a smoker's lung is very dark and is covered with tartar. They find this offensive because they believe that, since smoking is not a crime, the government nor anyone else should not have a say about what they do and limit their freedom. I am not a smoker, and I cannot stand having the stench of smoke on my clothes.
It's a major cause for second hand smoke, lung cancer, and death. The three main reasons to ban smoking in public are because of the health risks, offensive smell, and environmental risks that are the cause of cigarette smoke. Private businesses are not supposed to be required to cater to the whim or concern of every single person. Smokers and non-smokers meet at many places like offices, buses, hotels, etc. So, as the food-safety is caring for our health by banning maggi, so why can't smoking?? To ensure adequate smoke-free recreation licensing for smoke-allowing establishments should be required but it shouldn't be banned outright.
As it stands though, that overcome the only challenge Pro presented, and it was Pro that needed to be the one overcoming Con, not the other way around. When you're old enough you can smoke, until then know your place and stop leeching off society, acting like the world owes you a living. Many people, including a sizeable number of non-smokers, are opposed to the idea of banning outdoor smoking on philosophical grounds. Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those around them. It should be noted that many activities, such as playing loud music, engaging in sexually provocative activity, dressing in inappropriately scanty attires, are banned in public places simply because they are annoying and irritating. List of Pros of Smoking Bans 1.
Apart from heart diseases, other health hazards that are becoming increasingly common in both smokers and non-smokers are cancer and cirrhosis. The young generation think that those who smoke are smart, modern and intellectual. For example, a healthy lung is pinkish in color and helps the person breathe in oxygen and exhale carbon dioxide. People in public places are harmed by many other things that are not banned, like cars produce air pollution, fires, and many other things like that. For those who are desperately trying to kick the filthy habit, I wish you the best of luck: Cold turkey is hard, but after a month, you will find that your sense of taste returns, yay, I could taste real food again. Passive smoking kills so many people it's not fair on others.
Should smoking be banned in public places? The people in favor of cigarette smoking believe it is good for many reasons, but those opposed to smoking believe it should be banned in public places. Many people feel it is their right to smoke wherever they please, and you should just get over it; but as ieltsbuddy. A Nonsmokers who inhales second hand smoke gets the same toxic chemicals and in additional to smoking the more smoke you inhale the more detrimental chemicals you will inhale. If one person smokes in public place he speares plenty of dieases,and be frank our culture does not supports smoking in public because of wrong impact on youth and as well as children. I know for sure that I do not. They are making their health a problem to themselves, not others.
Since the early 1990s, most states and cities have banned smoking in public indoor spaces such as bars, restaurants, and offices. It is the same going to a garbage dump, and smelling like garbage. Second-hand smoke is just as bad as directly smoking something. Smoking or not is your choice, but if smoking in public affect others, you should consider if it is appropriate. What is the boundary between the collective good and the individual freedom? The theory is that if smokers are sufficiently discouraged from lighting up in public, they will be more likely to quit and, therefore, avoid developing a smoking-related illness. If anything, they force smokers to cling to their addiction even more tightly, safely out of public view.
While there is ample evidence that being in a smoky indoor space exposes you to carcinogens, the same cannot be said about outdoor secondhand smoke. Similarly, extreme sports are practiced by an increasing number of people regardless of the dangers they entail. My throat and nasal passage ways were closing up and I had to take many trips to the doctor to get a shot to calm them down. Smokers whether they like it or not, are criticized and judged daily by stranger just for having a cigarette in their mouth. I believe that every time governments impose a law designed to compel individuals to improve their health — whether they like it or not — we make the individual less responsible for their own actions. Second hand will only kill under outrageous circumstances.
Actors, politicians, parents and other figures we admired used to smoke. Since most smokers prefer to drop their butts on the ground, ban advocates argue that the best way to keep the streets clean is to ban smoking altogether. Due to public smoking, the fumes get accumulated in the atmosphere thereby, impacting non —smokers also at the same magnitude which also includes children and old people. For instance, in many countries it is allowed to drink alcohol in public places. Consider the typical public place — a door entrance, a park bench, an elevator.